According to DeFi Education Fund, Web2 front ends are typically custodial and account-based, while Web3 front ends are non-custodial and wallet-based, which directly affects trader control over execution and asset custody (source: DeFi Education Fund, X post, Oct 20, 2025). According to DeFi Education Fund, centralized Web2 interfaces can impose KYC and geo-blocking that disrupt market access, whereas Web3 interfaces enable permissionless interaction with on-chain smart contracts from compatible wallets (source: DeFi Education Fund, X post, Oct 20, 2025). According to Ethereum.org, self-custody shifts security and transaction management to the user, with finality and fees determined on-chain, impacting execution certainty and costs during network congestion (source: Ethereum.org, Wallets and Transactions documentation, accessed Oct 2024).

According to Dean 利迪恩 (@deanmlittle), the complexities of Web2 development surpass those of Web3, as shared in a recent tweet on May 22, 2025 (source: Twitter). For crypto traders, this highlights that Web3 platforms may offer streamlined, user-focused environments, potentially driving greater adoption and transaction volume in decentralized finance (DeFi) and blockchain-based applications. The perceived ease of Web3 compared to Web2 could accelerate migration of both users and developers to the crypto ecosystem, ultimately supporting bullish sentiment and increased liquidity in related tokens and projects.